So it is official. Jacob Zuma is off the hook, as the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) confirmed the rumors that had been swirling for several days by dropping the charges against the African National Congress (and likely future South African) president. (See the full text of the NPA decision here.) Presumably, then, this long and sordid story is done. Or at least it will move on the a new phase — Zuma and his supporters will declare that he has been vindicated (though as National Director of Public Prosecutions Mokotedi Mpshe pointed out on Monday, the dropping of the charges does not amount to an acquittal) and the opposition parties will gnash their teeth.
But it is almost unimaginable that the charges will ever be reinstated, whatever the Congress of the People and Democratic Alliance hope, so Zuma, South Africa’s teflon politician, once again finds that no charges against him stick. And yet South Africans ought to find it disquieting that their likely next president needs a teflon coating to begin with. Make no mistake about it — the Zuma case has been politicized on all sides to the point of obscuring the very real case against him. And don’t forget that the seemingly interminable corruption imbroglio almost obscured the fact that Zuma already had a significant brush with the legal system when he was charged with rape, which led to a controversial acquittal.
Jacob Zuma has gotten what he so dearly wanted and needed, which outs him in position to claim his ultimate prize. But South Africans looking toward their political future would be fully justified in wondering just how bright that future will be with Zuma at the helm. Will he uphold the rule of law, or will the law be a mere impediment to plow through when he cannot maneuver around it? His past record does not exactly inspire optimism.