In a recent article in The Mail & Guardian Michael Georgy makes the case that the deadlock in Zimbabwe represents yet another failure for Thabo Mbeki, another sign of his waning credibility and fading influence at home and abroad.
The case seems pretty strong. Yet something about this argument does not strike me as being quite right or quite fair. Certainly Mbeki deserves plenty of blame for letting the Zimbabwe sore fester for as long as it has without taking stronger action, without pushing for a resolution sooner, without taking more seriously his mandate to broker peace on the behalf of SADC, without ever, to this day, truly condemning Robert Mugabe or at minimum what mugabe allowed to happen to his country. And as a consequence things have gotten to where they are, for which Thabo Mbeki is one of many actors who deserves his share of the blame.
But at the same time, Mbeki is in no position to force an agreement right now. Cliches about horses and water and forcing them to drink come to mind. I suppose that were a deal to come that the world could celebrate Mbeki would bask in the credit, and as a consequence he has to deal with the backlash. But there are situations where credit might be due success even if equal blame is not due failure. Many of us knew that these negotiations would only go as far as Robert Mugabe would allow them to go. And so they have. For this, at least, it is hard for me to blame Thabo Mbeki.